Are there any prediction markets services you would recommend?

No Gravatar

LinkedIn:

Are there any prediction markets services you would recommend?

Hi all,
I am searching for companies that are specialized in prediction markets. So far I found examples such as newsfutures, nosco, and some more. Have you done business with any of these companies or may there be others you would recommend?
Thanks in advance – Jillian

Jillian Falconi
Innovation Consultant at Saxo Bank

I have answered her request. It&#8217-s a pity I was able to list only three experts in the field of prediction markets. I wanted to give her more names. LinkedIn limits us to three names of experts. Totally stupid&#8230- Sorry to Adam Siegel and Chris Hibbert and others&#8230-

Here&#8217-s the page that this consultant should visit: BEST – the best links about prediction markerts.

Previous blog posts by Chris F. Masse:

  • Do join the “Prediction Markets” group at LinkedIn, if you have a strong interest in the prediction markets or if you work in the prediction market industry. It’s free, and that’s a way for the LinkedIn visitors browsing stuff about prediction markets to stumble upon your resume / profile.
  • You can now join the LinkedIn group on Prediction Markets.
  • Nigel Eccles says that HubDub generates “data on peoples’ reputations for accurately analyzing and forecasting future events”.
  • I did drop BetFair from the Midas Oracle coverage of the prediction markets. They should re-establish the direct links, from their 2 frontpages, to the prediction markets on politics, finance, and the other socially valuable issues.
  • I dropped BetFair from the Midas Oracle coverage of the prediction markets. They should re-establish the direct links, from their 2 frontpages, to the prediction markets on politics, finance, and the other socially valuable issues.
  • I am dropping BetFair from the Midas Oracle coverage of the prediction markets —until they re-establish the direct links, from their 2 frontpages, to the prediction markets on politics, finance, and the other socially valuable issues.
  • 2 web links that are not about prediction markets —but which you should check.

Were the InTrade prediction markets on the November 2006s Senate elections accurate?

No Gravatar

Revisiting the issue, almost one year later.

Lance Fortnow (University of Chicago) wrote:

So how did those predictions go? In short you can say the markets predicted every individual race correctly but got the senate wrong, but let us look a little more carefully.

At about 9 AM CST on the morning of election day I made a snap shot of the map for a Discovery Channel Website article.

Every state colored blue was won by a democrat and every state colored red went to a republican. But also note the 69% given to GOP (Republican) Senate control although this election will give control to the democrats. No outcome would have made all the states and senate control agree with the 9 AM map.

Were the markets inconsistent? No, because the markets predict not absolutely but probabilistically. For example, the markets gave a probability of winning 60% for each of Virginia and Missouri and the democrats needed both to take the senate. If these races were independent events, the probability that the democrats take both is 36% or a 64% chance of GOP senate control assuming no other surprises.

Of course the races were not independent events and there are other states involved making it more difficult to compare the probabilities of the individual races with that of senate control.

So how did the markets do as predictors? Quite well as the outcome seems quite reasonable given the markets. Other outcomes would have also been reasonable such as the Democrats losing Virginia and the senate remaining in republican hands, a possibility that came very close to happening.

Previous blog posts by Chris F. Masse:

  • Professor Koleman Strumpf explains the prediction markets to the countryland people.
  • Professor Koleman Strumpf tells CNN that a prediction market, by essence, can’t predict an upset.
  • Time magazine interview the 2 BetFair-Tradefair co-founders, and not a single time do they pronounce the magic words, “prediction markets”.
  • One Deep Throat told me that this VC firm might have been connected with the Irish prediction exchange, at inception.
  • BetFair Rapid = BetFair’s standalone, local, PC-based, order-entry software for prediction markets
  • Michael Moore tells the Democratic people to go Barack Obama in Pennsylvania (a two-tier state), but the polls and the prediction markets tell us that that won’t do the trick.
  • CALLING ALL DEEP THROATS: What is it that Smarkets want to do in Malta, E.U.? And what will Smarkets market anyway?

Where is the libertarian critique of Justin Wolfers Op-Ed on point-shaving betting in the New York Times?

No Gravatar

Nowhere.

Not on Freakonomics.

Not on Marginal Revolution.

Not on Caveat Bettor.

Nobody asked the good questions: Why is it that point-shaving betting is so popular? Could it be that bettors like point-shaving betting very much for good reasons? And should governments and/or sports authorities forbid a popular form of betting on the ground that a small group of people are cheaters? Is there a way to catch those cheaters without clamping down on the whole bunch of point-shaving bettors (who are honest people, for the most part)?

I have the feeling that Prawf Koleman Strumpf would have had a more libertarian approach to this point-shaving betting issue. And shouldn&#8217-t we look more closely at the United Kingdom, where BetFair cooperates with the sports bodies and the police to trace the cheaters?

Previous: Justin Wolfers wants America’s sports bodies to allow sports betting so as to outlaw the quirky bets that induce corruption. + Point Shaving in the NBA: An Economic Analysis of the NBA’s Point Spread Betting Market

UPDATE: Michael Giberson&#8230-

Practical considerations are raised by the proposal to outlaw certain types of bets. Given that, in the U.S., sports gambling is already prohibited in all but a few places, and nonetheless illegal gambling is thriving. One wonders how to induce parties already willing to gamble illegally to only illegally gamble on governmentally-approved forms of bets.

Wolfers answer seems to be that expanding legal sports gamblings on outcomes only would allow legal operators to out-compete illegal operators. But the competitiveness of legal operators will depend in part on their ability to offer attractive betting opportunities, and that ability would be limited under his proposal.

Nonetheless, legalization of sports gambling does carry with it the advantages of relative transparency, which can aid in the detection gambling-based manipulation. [*]

These practical considerations don’t raise to the level of the principled libertarian critique that Chris is in search of, but they do tend to point toward the same result: broader legalization of gambling conducted under a regime of legally enforceable property rights.

[*] Just a related note. In the U.K., the (legal) bookmakers have been reluctant to to give the names of cheaters to the Police, whereas the (legal) BetFair has always been prompt to fight sports corruption.

UPDATE #2: Niall O&#8217-Connor&#8230-

[*] Just a related note. In the U.K., the (legal) bookmakers have been reluctant to to give the names of cheaters to the Police, whereas the (legal) BetFair has always been prompt to fight sports corruption.

This is indeed true- with one significant caveat. It is my belief that most of the major bookmakers and the spread betting companies use Betfair to hedge. They are, thus in theory masking the identity of their clients, when they use Betfair. As you rightly say, they have in the past been reluctant to expose these clients to the light. Should Betfair therefore accept hedging money from these organisations, which, by its own admission, do not have the appropriate systems in place&#8230-

TYLER COWENS BOOK – Discover Your Inner Economist: Use Incentives to Fall in Love, Survive Your Next Meeting, and Motivate Your Dentist.

No Gravatar

ASKING THE MIDAS ORACLE READERS TO CHEAT ON TYLER COWEN.

DO YOU KNOW THE URL OF TYLER COWEN&#8217-S SECRET BLOG?? IF YES, PLEASE, SEND ITS URL TO CHRIS MASSE. ANONYMITY GUARANTEED. AND I PROMISE I WON&#8217-T PUBLISH IT.

[I’m testing the solidity of the oath taken by the purchasers of Tyler Cowen’s new book —they had to promise not to give out the URL of his secret blog to strangers. By the same token, I’m also testing the power of Midas Oracle when it comes to attracting Deep Throats.]

&#8212-

Tyler Cowen on the Volokh blog:

New books and secret blogs: some results

A few days ago, on [Marginal Revolution], I offered access to a secret blog (over forty posts) to anyone who would pre-order my forthcoming book Discover Your Inner Economist: Use Incentives to Fall in Love, Survive Your Next Meeting, and Motivate Your Dentist, due out August 2 from Dutton. The deal, which still stands for all, is that the reader need only write an email to [email protected] and tell me they pre-ordered the book. My underlying hypothesis was that blog readers are not always book readers, so why not package a blog with a book? I was surprised by the results:

1. The orders drove the book up to #220 on Amazon.

2. So far no one has leaked the site address, even though hundreds of people (many of them bloggers) have it.

3. Most people sent in proof of purchase, and were keen to have me look at it, even though I did not ask for it.

4. People asked very earnestly whether it was permissible to show the secret blog to their spouse (it is).

5. Some people wrote me long emails, with complex economic arguments, as to why I should give them the blog for free. But they weren&#8217-t willing to simply lie and get the site address.

6. Some people wrote me long emails with instructions and advice as to how to keep the blog secret for a long time, and possible dangers I might face in maintaining that secrecy.

We&#8217-ll see how this progresses. No, we can&#8217-t fund the nuclear umbrella this way, but I am heartened by the honesty and cooperativeness of the blog-reading community.

Tyler Cowen to Chris Masse (&#8221-Do you mention the prediction markets in your new book?&#8220-):

Absolutely I mention them, in the context of discussing Robin Hanson, in the chapter on &#8220-How to Look Good&#8221-&#8230-

TYLER COWEN – Discover Your Inner Economist: Use Incentives to Fall in Love, Survive Your Next Meeting, and Motivate Your Dentist.

Discover Your Inner Economist: Use Incentives to Fall in Love, Survive Your Next Meeting, and Motivate Your Dentist

Guess where Flutter founder Vince Monical is working right now??

At Google, of course. As &#8220-Director of Commerce and Analytics&#8221-.

– Flutter was bought out by BetFair in December 2001 &#8212-a &#8220-merger&#8221-, they said.

– Justin Wolfers knows Vince Monical too well. PDF

Read the previous blog posts by Chris. F. Masse:

  • Pervez Musharraf prediction markets –Eric Zitzewitz Edition
  • The Over-Round Explained
  • WHY THE PREDICTION MARKETS WILL LIKELY F**K UP SUPER TUESDAY 2008.
  • Still unconvinced by prediction market journalist Justin Wolfers
  • Oprah Winfrey
  • RIGHT-CLICK THIS IMAGE, AND FILL IN THIS SURVEY, PLEASE.
  • Papers on Prediction Markets

IPO Price Discovery

No Gravatar

Since the launch of the simExchange, stocks and futures contracts have debuted at a price suggested by the submitter of the game with some adjustment by the admins of the simExchange. This price was generally too high or too low, resulting in sharp price moves following the IPO and windfall profits. This is expected as the forecast of an individual inefficiently aggregates information compared against a market. Although many traders have come to expect windfall profits from an IPO (possibly from the irrational exuberance of the 90s tech bubble), this is not how an IPO is supposed to work.

To remedy this problem, the simExchange began the use of an experimental new IPO process to determine the IPO price. We evaluated many IPO processes such as Dutch auctions and Parimutuel Auctions but decided on a Double Call Auction to keep the process simple. A double call auction is how trading on the simExchange has always functioned. The only difference from standard trading is that the automated market maker is turned off.

Price discovery works through traders submitting buy orders at the maximum price they are willing to buy at and submitting sell orders at the minimum price they are willing to sell at. Essentially, traders are posting a range of how well they think the game will sell—a maximum and a minimum.

For a single trader, this range may be very large. They may think a game will sell a minimum of 400,000 copies (40 DKP) and a maximum of 600,000 copies (60 DKP). This would equate to a buy order at 40 DKP and a sell order at 60 DKP. With this player’s orders alone, the bid-ask spread is a very large 20 DKP.

However, a second trader may believe the game will sell at least 500,000 copies (50 DKP) and at most 650,000 copies (65 DKP). The trader’s orders represents a 15 DKP bid-ask spread, but together with the other trader, the best bid is now 50 DKP and the best ask is now 60 DKP. The bid-ask spread is now 10 DKP.

A third trader believes the game may only sell 300,000 copies (30 DKP) with a max of 550,000 copies (55 DKP). The bid-ask spread is now 5 DKP. The order book would look like this:

BidAsk
5055
4060
3065

As more traders submit orders, the bid-ask spread will tighten and converge on a market price. Individually, no one knows what the IPO price should be, but together, traders can narrow the range down substantially. This price range should be the best guess of a fair IPO price as this is where the buyers and sellers meet (the optimists and pessimists for the game’s potential sales). In this IPO process, trades only occur when traders are willing to buy and sell at the same price. Once again, this is no different from normal trading except there is no automated market maker submitting orders.

However, this process has proven to be difficult to understand for many members of the simExchange, especially those who use the Basic Trading mode, which is limited to placing market orders (orders that immediately take the best available price). If a trader is not used to looking at what is the current selling price, he may be in for a surprise when his buy order fills.

Originally we had considered reserving the IPO process only to those using the Advanced Trading interface so that traders are forced to identify the matching price they would accept. However, we thought traders using the Basic Mode should still be allowed to participate if they see a price they think is good for buying or selling. Of course, this assumes the trader using the Basic Trading mode is paying attention to the current bid and ask prices. However, many traders using the Basic Trading mode ended up with prices they were not happy with.

Last night, we have heard a deep debate regarding the IPO process. Our goal is to make accurate forecasts in an entertaining and easy to play process. It appears the experimental IPO process has failed to accomplish those goals for many traders.

Based on user suggestions, we will combine the experimental process with elements of the original IPO process into a 2-step IPO process. Once a stock or future is listed on the simExchange, there will be a stage to determine the IPO price. This will be a three-day period in which players place orders in a double call auction. To participate in the double call auction, the player must specify the maximum price he will buy at or the minimum price he will sell at. After the three-day period, an IPO price will be calculated. At this point, the second stage will occur with the stock or future available for purchase or shorting at the IPO price all day by all traders. Following this day, regular trading with automated market maker will commence.

This article was cross-posted from Discovering an IPO price dated July 26 on The simExchange Official Blog.

How to expand the offerings of real-money and play-money event derivatives

No Gravatar

#1. DIY prediction markets, a la Inkling Markets. Con: nobody will come to trade it.

#2. Ask the big prediction exchanges (BetFair, TradeSports-InTrade, NewsFutures) to float your X proposals. Con: very difficult to get the higher-ups to listen to you.

#3. Create your own vertical prediction exchange (a la Media Predict or PopSci&#8217-s PPX). Con: you need to secure the backing of a media to attract traders.

&#8212-

The solution, in my view, would be for each of the big betting exchanges (BetFair, TradeSports-InTrade and NewsFutures) to allow the creation of media-backed, vertical sub-exchanges linked to their main, generalist platform &#8212-so the liquidity can move in a bidirectional way.

&#8212-

The latest about the departing of Nobel Laureate Vernon Smith from George Mason University to Chapman University

No Gravatar

– Vernon Smith to Work on Californian Public Policy

In Reverse Migration, 4 Economists Lured From the West to George Mason U. Now Head to Chapman U. – Chronicle.com

– NEW LINKS News: Chapman hires Nobel Prize-winner | smith, chapman, university – OCRegister.com + Chapman’s newest hire was tempted by ideal post” + “Today’s editorial: Chapman raises its economics profile”

– NEW LINK: Chapman U. hires Nobel winner and team – Los Angeles Times

– The George Mason University statement

– The Chapman University statement

– The Wall Street Journal take

Previous: Deep Throat on the George Mason University exodus to Chapman University. + All GMU’s ICES faculty except Houser and McCabe are leaving to join Chapman University. + NOBEL LAUREATE VERNON SMITH LEAVES ROBIN HANSON’S GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY TO GO WORKING FOR TOM W. BELL’S CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY.

OFFICIAL: NOBEL LAUREATE VERNON SMITH DECAMPS FOR WEST COASTS CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY.

No Gravatar

– The George Mason University statement

– The Chapman University statement

– The Wall Street Journal take

Previous: Deep Throat on the George Mason University exodus to Chapman University. + All GMU’s ICES faculty except Houser and McCabe are leaving to join Chapman University. + NOBEL LAUREATE VERNON SMITH LEAVES ROBIN HANSON’S GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY TO GO WORKING FOR TOM W. BELL’S CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY.

UPDATE:

– Vernon Smith to Work on Californian Public Policy

– In Reverse Migration, 4 Economists Lured From the West to George Mason U. Now Head to Chapman U. – Chronicle.com

NEXT: The latest about the departing of Nobel Laureate Vernon Smith from George Mason University to Chapman University

What is the BetFair Exchange API?

No Gravatar

BetFair Developers Program:

The Exchange Application Programming Interface (API) is the tool on which participants in the Developers Program are able to build customised tools and interfaces to use with the Betfair (sports) Exchange. Normally users will read market information, place bets, and check current bet details and account statements via the Betfair web interface. With the Exchange API, you can communicate directly with the Betfair database in XML format via a SOAP interface. By using the Exchange API, your application can provide a custom interface, functionality and specialized operations not otherwise afforded by the web interface. The Exchange API is independent of the Betfair web interface– therefore you can build stable, custom functionality and interfaces to suit your betting methodology or custom application. Changes in the web interface will not affect the operation of your program.

BetFair Developers Program Support Center