Solar activity and cosmic rays drive the Earths climate.

No Gravatar

Global warming due to human-produced CO2 is the biggest scientific imposture of all times.

Henrik Svensmark &#8211- The Cloud Mystery (French version):

Richard Lindzen:

Vincent Courtillot (in French, alas):

The Climate Gate scandal highlights the modus operandi of the academic mafia.

No Gravatar

Required reading this Friday:

How to Manufacture a Climate Consensus &#8211- About expelling the non-believers from the academic journals publishing on climate science

The Dog Ate Global Warming &#8211- About the destruction of raw temperature data of Planet Earth

More info on climate change.

P.S.: East Anglia e-mails (CRU)

Climate Stats = Sausage Making

No Gravatar

How to Make Your Own Hockey Stick &#8211- Required reading for our good friend Caveat Bettor.

More info on &#8220-climategate&#8221- at Memeorandum

&#8220-Hide the decline&#8221-

&#8220-Hide the decline&#8221-

Every time the global temperature data gets revised and homogenized, the trends keep increasing.

No Gravatar

One scientist investigated data from one source:

What this does show is that there is at least one temperature station where the trend has been artificially increased to give a false warming where the raw data shows cooling. In addition, the average raw data for Northern Australia is quite different from the adjusted, so there must be a number of … mmm … let me say “interesting” adjustments in Northern Australia other than just Darwin.

And with the Latin saying “Falsus in unum, falsus in omis” (false in one, false in all) as our guide, until all of the station “adjustments” are examined, adjustments of CRU, GHCN, and GISS alike, we can’t trust anyone using homogenized numbers.

More at Memeorandum

Economist Brad DeLong has received a DMCA takedown notice from HarperCollins, publisher of Steve Levitt and Steve Dubners SuperFreakonomics.

No Gravatar

Brad DeLong has received a DMCA takedown notice from HarperCollins.

http://delong.typepad.com/files/superfreakonomics-chapter-5.pdf

Is SuperFreakonomics author Levitt again denying the ‘unequivocal’ scientific evidence for global warming? New Yorker’s Kolbert calls book a form of “horseshit.”

One error retracted, 99 to go. Superfreaknomics authors will, in future editions, correct their claim that Caldeira believes “carbon dioxide is not the right villain”.

Ken Caldeira’s Carbon Solution

Intellectual Ventures wanna solve global warming via stratoshield.

No Gravatar

&#8220-Rep. Jay Inslee (D-WA) assailed the authors of SuperFreakonomics for participating in the effort to deceive the American public on the science of global warming, in particular for their &#8220-absolute deception&#8221- in their portrayal of the views of climate scientist Ken Caldeira. He criticized the book during a hearing of the House Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming investigating forged letters sent on behalf of the coal industry opposing climate legislation.&#8221-

Ocean acidification:

Geo-Engineering Planet Earth – The Super Freakonomics Solution To Global Warming

No Gravatar

Narrator: “Every year, more and more ice must be dumped into the ocean to cool the earth, thus solving the problem forever.&#8221-

Little Girl: &#8220-But . . .&#8221-

Narrator: &#8220-Forever!!!&#8221-

The SuperFreakonomics Global-Warming Fact Quiz

Read all the comments there.

UPDATE: Climate Progress + AP

UPDATE: Harvard Business Review